Gerry Sutcliffe: I have great pleasure in announcing the publication of the fifth annual MAPPA reports today. Multi-agency Public Protection Arrangements, or MAPPA, are now well established across England and Wales and making an increasing contribution to protecting the public, preventing re-victimisation, and reducing re-offending.
	The arrangements focus upon those violent and sexual offenders who are assessed as presenting the greatest risk of harm and whose safe management requires a high level of inter-agency co-operation. They are led locally by the probation, police and prison services working together with other agencies who contribute to the management of these individuals, including social care, health, housing and education services.
	This year has seen significant challenges to those operating MAPPA, in the form of general and specific case reviews that have underlined significant progress made through MAPPA, but have also highlighted certain areas for improvement. It must be remembered that effective management of high-risk offenders, as a discipline, is still relatively in its infancy. There is continuous development and the standards and good practice of tomorrow are likely to be different from today's, achieved through experience and research. The challenge therefore is not only to match current practice with what we know, but also to respond rapidly to new learning.
	The individual agencies have responded with major national initiatives to improve the assessment and management of MAPPA offenders and these, together with local actions, are reflected in the MAPPA business plans which appear with the annual reports for the first time this year.
	The offences committed by those offenders qualifying for management within MAPPA make an enormous impact; principally upon the victims but also upon the wider public consciousness. They raise questions about how the risks presented by such offenders are assessed and then how is it possible to manage those risks once the offender returns to the community. While we can never eliminate risk entirely, we are all entitled to expect that everything that can be done is being done to prevent these offenders from re-offending.
	I would like first to say that even amongst those qualifying for MAPPA; the majority are managed within ordinary agency arrangements. While no incidence of further offending can ever be acceptable, it is a tribute to the effectiveness of the arrangements that very few of those who require active MAPPA management, are charged with a further serious offence, while so managed. I commend these annual reports because they detail the work that goes on day in, day out in cases which generally don't make the headlines, because of the skill and commitment of the agencies involved in protecting the public, including the key work to prevent offending against previous victims.
	Copies of every area report are being placed in the Library of the House.

Margaret Hodge: In his statement to Parliament of 28 February 2006, my predecessor, Alun Michael, launched a consultation on future structural funds spending in the UK. The consultation invited comments on three issues: the draft National Strategic Reference Frameworkfor Future UK Structural Funds Programmes; the Government's approach to distributing the UK's structural funds allocations under the new competitiveness objective; and administrative arrangements for delivering the funds during the next budgetary cycle.
	I am today publishing the Government's response to the consultation exercise and the UK's National Strategic Reference Framework for Structural Funds Programmes during the 2007-13 period and these will be placed in the Library of the House. These documents set out the strategy for future structural funds spending across the UK, the allocations of funding for future programmes, and the administrative arrangements for delivering the programmes.
	Under the new EU regulations for the structural funds, each member state must draw up a National Strategic Reference Framework establishing its broad priorities for future structural funds spending. The DTI has developed the UK's national framework in close collaboration with other Government Departments responsible for the structural funds, the Scottish Executive, the Welsh Assembly Government, the Northern Ireland Administration and the Government of Gibraltar. The strategy establishes three high-level priorities for future programmes: enterprise and innovation, skills and employment, and environmental and community sustainability.
	The national framework also makes a firm commitment to use the structural funds to support ethnic minorities. It requires all programmes to take account of the needs of ethnic minorities when determining priorities and in the development of individual projects. In particular, they should take account of the difficulties that certain ethnic minorities face in accessing the labour market and the low levels of employment, skills and entrepreneurship suffered by certain ethnic minority groups.
	As explained in the response to the consultation, the Government have decided that the UK's mainstream competitiveness funding should be divided equally between the European Regional Development Fund (for regional development) and the European Social Fund (for promoting employment) at the UK level. As phasing-in competitiveness regions, South Yorkshire and Merseyside are a special case. The Government have therefore decided to allocate 60 per cent. of the phasing-in competitiveness funds for South Yorkshire and Merseyside to the ERDF and 40 per cent. to the ESF.
	The Government have decided to allocate ERDF competitiveness funding between the UK's competitiveness regions by reference to population, GVA and levels of innovation, enterprise and skills. The Government have also applied a cap and safety net to limit the change in each region's proportion of funding in comparison with 2000-06. This will protect regions from particularly heavy reductions in their proportion of funding.
	The Government have decided to allocate ESF competitiveness funding between the UK's competitiveness regions by reference to numbers of workless people, numbers of working age people with no qualifications, and numbers of working age people with low qualifications. Again it has applied a cap and safety net to limit the change in each region's proportion of funding in comparison with 2000-06.
	The UK will face a 50 per cent. reduction in total structural funds allocations for 2007-13 in comparison with the current period, reflecting our strong economic performance and the need to focus funding on the poorer new member states. This means that most regions will, inevitably, suffer a significant reduction in funding. However, the Government's approach will ensure that funding is allocated fairly between the UK's competitiveness regions on the basis of objective evidence of economic need. It will also ensure that the allocation of funding supports our domestic priorities for regional development and employment.
	England will receive a total of €4.2 billion(1) or€91 per capita in competitiveness funding. Within England, the funds will be focused on the six underperforming regions, which will receive €121 per capita on average, or 73 per cent. of England's share of the funds. The richer English regions will receive lower allocations, reflecting their stronger economic position, but allowing them to tackle pockets of deprivation. For example, the three regions of the Greater South East will receive on average €54 per capita. Cornwall will also receive €579 million of convergence funding, agreed at the EU level.
	Scotland will receive a total of €573 million or€122 per capita in competitiveness funding for 2007-13. It will also receive €157 million in phasing-out convergence funding for the Highlands and Islands. Wales will receive a total of €121 million or €114 per capita in competitiveness funding for 2007-13. It will also receive €1.8 billion in convergence funding for West Wales and the Valleys. Northern Ireland will receive a total of €419 million or €248 per capita in competitiveness funding for 2007-13.
	The new arrangements for distributing competitiveness funding are a radical departure from the approach used in 2000-06. We now have the opportunity to put in place an objective methodology based on sound economic criteria. The change to a new system inevitably modifies each region's proportion of the funds in comparison with the current period. However, the use of a cap and safety net limits the change in each region's proportion of receipts, ensuring that no region faces a much steeper cliff-edge than others, and facilitating the transition from higher levels of funding in the current period.
	The response to the consultation explains in more detail the Government's methodologies for allocating the funding. The indicative allocations for each of the UK's competitiveness programmes are set out in an annex to the national framework. The European Commission must agree the allocations under the new Structural Funds Regulations.
	Finally, the response to the consultation and the national framework set out the broad arrangements for delivering the funds in during the 2007- 13 period. In England, the RDAs will take a leading role in delivering regional ERDF programmes, working in partnership with local stakeholders. Meanwhile, the regional skills partnerships will play an active role in setting strategies for ESF spending in the English regions within the context of a national English ESF programme. In this way, the two funds, while separate, can be more easily aligned to meet defined local and regional needs.
	(1) All allocations are in 2004 prices and are total allocations for the 2007-13 period. These allocations will be up-rated in due course to current prices for each year of the 2007-13 programming period.